On
January 27, 2010, FDA approved revisions to the Prezista (darunavir)
product labeling to include the 96 week data from two trials;
one trial in treatment-experienced patients (TMC114-C214) and
one trial in treatment-naive patients (TMC114-C211).
Section 6: Adverse Reactions and Section 14 Clinical Studies were
updated to reflect the updated 96 week efficacy and safety data.
The 96 week efficacy results are summarized briefly below. Study
TMC114-C211 [ARTEMIS] is a randomized, controlled, open-label
Phase 3 trial comparing Prezista/ritonavir 800/100 mg once daily
versus lopinavir/ritonavir 800/200 mg per day (given as a twice
daily or as a once daily regimen) in antiretroviral treatment-naive
HIV-1 infected adult subjects. All patients received a fixed background
regimen consisting of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) 300
mg once daily and emtricitabine 200 mg once daily (FTC). At Week
96, 78% of patients randomized to Prezista/ritonavir were virologic
successes (HIV RNA < 50 copies/mL) compared to 74% of patients
randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir. Study TMC114-C214 [TITAN] is
a randomized, controlled, open-label Phase 3 trial comparing Prezista/ritonavir
600/100 mg twice daily versus lopinavir/ritonavir 400/100 mg twice
daily in antiretroviral treatment-experienced, lopinavir/ritonavir-naive
HIV-1 infected adult subjects. Both arms used an optimized background
regimen consisting of at least 2 antiretrovirals (nucleoside reverse
transcriptase inhibitors with or without non-nucleoside reverse
transcriptase inhibitors). At Week 96, 58% of patients randomized
to Prezista/ritonavir were virologic successes (HIV RNA < 50
copies/mL) compared to 52% of patients randomized to lopinavir/ritonavir.
Additional revisions were made to the label and include the following:
The Contraindications section (Section 4) is updated for alfuzosin
(Table 2) in order to maintain consistency with the list of contraindicated
medications in the ritonavir label: In Section 6.1 Clinical Trials
Experience: Treatment-Naive Adults, under Less Common Adverse
Reactions: drug hypersensitivity, angioedema and urticaria were
added. In Section 6.2 Clinical Trials Experience: Treatment-Experienced
Adults, under Less Common Adverse Reactions: urticaria was added.
A new section was added to identify osteonecrosis as an Adverse
Drug Reaction (ADR). Section 6.4 Additional ADRs to Prezista/ritonavir
identified in adult subjects in other clinical trials. The additional
ADR of interest identified from other clinical trials was osteonecrosis.
The Postmarketing Experience Section (Section 6.7) was updated
to include: redistribution of body fat and toxic epidermal necrolysis.
Drug Interactions (Section 7), Table 7 was updated with the maraviroc
drug interaction data. In summary maraviroc concentrations are
increased when co-administered with Prezista/ritonavir. When used
in combination with Prezista/ritonavir, the dose of maraviroc
should be 150 mg twice daily. The Microbiology section (Section
12.4) is updated with additional resistance data and baseline
genotype and phenotype virologic analyses and cross-resistance
data.
Full product information is available online at www.prezista.com.
Videx
EC/Videx (didanosine) label change reflects potential for serious
liver disorder
The
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is alerting healthcare professionals
and patients about a rare, but serious, complication in the liver
known as non-cirrhotic portal hypertension in patients using Videx
or Videx EC (didanosine). Didanosine is a medication used to treat
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection.
Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension (portal hypertension that is
not caused by cirrhosis of the liver) is rare in the United States.
It occurs when blood flow in the major vein in the liver (the
portal vein) slows down. This slowed blood flow can lead to the
development of severely enlarged esophageal veins (varices) in
the gastrointestinal system. Because esophageal varices are thin
and portal hypertension increases the pressure of blood flow in
these veins, esophageal varices can break open. This can result
in serious bleeding and, in some cases, death.
FDA became aware of cases of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension
through adverse event reports submitted to FDA's Adverse Event
Reporting System (AERS). Based on these reports, FDA has revised
the didanosine drug label to include information about non-cirrhotic
portal hypertension to help ensure the safe use of this drug.
FDA believes the clinical benefits of didanosine for certain patients
with HIV continue to outweigh its potential risks. The decision
to use this drug, however, must be made on an individual basis
between the treating physician and the patient.
Data Summary
FDA's decision to revise the drug label for didanosine is based
on post-marketing reports of patients developing non-cirrhotic
portal hypertension while using didanosine. Other liver adverse
events such as lactic acidosis, hepatomegaly with steatosis, and
liver failure have been reported with the use of didanosine alone
and in combination with other antiviral drugs.
Of the 42 post-marketing cases of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension
in patients using didanosine:
 |
Twenty-six
were males, 14 were females, and in two no gender was specified. |
 |
The
ages ranged from 10 years to 66 years. |
 |
Duration
of didanosine treatment ranged from months to years before
development of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. |
 |
Definitive
cases of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension were confirmed
by biopsy and had no alternative etiology for the diagnosis. |
Medical
interventions described in the reported cases included:
 |
Banding/ligation
of esophageal varices in 8 patients. |
 |
Transjugular
intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPSS) procedure in three
patients. |
 |
Liver
transplantation in 3 patients. |
There
were four deaths total in the 42 reported cases. The cause of
death in the four patients was due to:
 |
Hemorrhage
from esophageal varices in two patients. |
 |
Progressive
liver failure in one patient. |
 |
A
combination of multi-organ failure, cerebral hemorrhage, sepsis,
and lactic acidosis in one patient. |
The
only patients who have been reported as fully recovered are the
three non-cirrhotic portal hypertension patients who received
a liver transplant.
A causal association is difficult to determine from postmarketing
reports alone. However, based on the number of well-documented
cases and exclusion of other causes of portal hypertension such
as alcohol-related cirrhosis or hepatitis C, FDA concludes there
is an association between use of didanosine and development of
non-cirrhotic portal hypertension. Because of the potential severity
of portal hypertension, including death from hemorrhaging esophageal
varices, FDA has revised the Warning
and Precautions section of the didanosine drug label
to assure safe use of the medication.
The Videx EC and Videx Pediatric Powder for Oral Solution were
revised as follows:
In Highlights section of the package insert under Warnings and
Precautions, the following was added: Non-cirrhotic portal hypertension:
Discontinue didanosine in patients with evidence of non-cirrhotic
portal hypertension
In section 5 Warnings and Precautions the following new subsection
was added:
5.4 Non-cirrhotic Portal Hypertension:?Postmarketing cases of
non-cirrhotic portal hypertension have been reported, including
cases leading to liver transplantation or death. Cases of didanosine-associated
non-cirrhotic portal hypertension were confirmed by liver biopsy
in patients with no evidence of viral hepatitis. Onset of signs
and symptoms ranged from months to years after start of didanosine
therapy. Common presenting features included elevated liver enzymes,
esophageal varices, hematemesis, ascites, and splenomegaly. Patients
receiving Videx should be monitored for early signs of portal
hypertension (e.g., thrombocytopenia and splenomegaly) during
routine medical visits. Appropriate laboratory testing including
liver enzymes, serum bilirubin, albumin, complete blood count,
and international normalized ratio (INR) and ultrasonography should
be considered. Videx should be discontinued in patients with evidence
of non-cirrhotic portal hypertension
In section 17 Patient Counseling Information the following was
added:
 |
17.5
Non-cirrhotic Portal Hypertension: Patients should be informed
that non-cirrhotic portal hypertension has been reported in
patients taking Videx, including cases leading to liver transplantation
or death. |
 |
Full
product information is available online: (Videx)
and (Videx
EC). |
Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir)
package insert revision regarding drug-drug interaction information
On
January 29, 2009, FDA approved revisions to the Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir)
package insert to include drug-drug interaction information for
concurrent Kaletra administration with inhaled medicines such
as salmeterol or salmeterol in combination with fluticasone propionate
(Serevent, Advair) and sildenafil (Revatio).
Specifically, sildenafil (Revatio) when used for the treatment
of pulmonary arterial hypertension is listed under Contraindications
(Section 4, Table 3) because a safe and effective dose has not
been established when used with Kaletra. There is an increased
potential for sildenafil-associated adverse events, including
visual abnormalities, hypotension, prolonged erections and syncope.
Additionally, in Section 7 Drug Interactions, Table 9 was revised
to include this information and differentiate use of PDE5 inhibitors
for pulmonary arterial hypertension and for erectile dysfunction.
Section 7 Drug Interactions Table 9 was revised to include the
following information on salmeterol.
Concurrent administration of salmeterol and Kaletra is not recommended.
The combination may result in increased risk of cardiovascular
adverse events associated with salmeterol, including QT prolongation,
palpitations and sinus tachycardia.
Section 17 Patient Counseling Information was revised to state:
 |
If
they are receiving sildenafil, tadalafil, or vardenafil they
may be at increased risk of associated adverse reactions including
hypotension, visual changes, and sustained erection, and should
promptly report any symptoms to their doctor |
 |
If
they are taking or before they begin using Serevent (salmeterol)
and Kaletra, they should talk with their doctor about problems
these two medicines may cause when taken together. The doctor
may choose not to keep someone on Serevent (salmeterol) |
 |
If
they are taking or before they begin using Advair (salmeterol
in combination with fluticasone propionate) and Kaletra, they
should talk to their doctor about problems these two medicines
may cause when taken together. The doctor may choose not to
keep someone on Advair (salmeterol in combination with fluticasone
propionate). |
 |
Similar
changes were made to the Medication Guide. |
 |
Full
product information is available online at www.kaletra.com. |
2/2/10
Sources
R
Klein and K Struble. Prezista (darunavir) labeling changes reflect
96 week study data. HIV/AIDS Update. January 28, 2010
R
Klein and K Struble. Videx EC/Videx (didanosine) label change
reflects potential for serious liver disorder. HIV/AIDS Update.
January 29, 2010
R
Klein and K Struble. Kaletra (lopinavir/ritonavir) package insert
revision regarding drug-drug interaction information. HIV/AIDS
Update. January 28, 2010
Tibotec
Therapeutics. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approves Labeling
Update for Prezista To Include 96-Week Data in HIV-1 Infected
Adult Patients. Press release. January 29, 2010.
|
|
|